

CONTRACT NO. HY/98/22
SUPPLEMENTARY
AGREEMENT NO. 3
ROAD WIDENING WORKS OF SALISBURY ROAD
BETWEEN NATHAN
ROAD AND CANTON ROAD
MONTHLY
EM&A REPORT NO. 5
CONTENTS
1.1 Background
1.2 Project
Organisation and Management Structure for EM&A Works
1.3
Contact
Details of Key Management
1.4
Construction
Programme
1.5
Works
undertaken in July 2002
1.6
Project
Works Area
2.0 SUMMARY OF EM&A REQUIREMENTS
2.1
Air
Quality
2.2
Noise
2.3
Environmental
Mitigation Measures
3.0 IMPLEMENTATION
SCHEDULE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES
3.1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures implemented by the Contractor in July 2002
4.1
Air Quality
4.2
Noise
4.3
Adverse effects on Air Quality and Noise Level from
Non-construction Activities and/or
Activities
form other Construction Sites
5.0 RECORD OF NON-COMPLIANCE, COMPLAINTS, NOTIFICATIONS OF SUMMONS AND SUCCESSFUL
PROSECUTIONS
5.1
Non-compliances
5.2
Complaints
and Verbal Complaints
5.3
Notifications
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
5.4
Review
of the Reasons for, and the Implications of, Non-compliances
5.5
Actions
taken to rectify the Non-compliances
5.6
Actions
taken in the event of Non-compliances
6.1
Potential
Environmental Impacts
6.2
Mitigation
Measures
7.0 ADVICE ON THE SOLID AND LIQUID
WASTE MANAGEMENT STATUS
7.1
Excess Excavated Materials
7.2
Construction Waste
7.3
Demolition Waste
7.4
Chemical Waste
7.5
General Refuse
8.0 SITE INSPECTION PROFORMA FOR
JULY 2002
APPENDICES
Appendix A Project Organisation Chart and
Management Structure for EM&A Works
Appendix B Construction Programme
Appendix C Project Works Area
Appendix D Dust Monitoring Locations
Appendix E Locations of Air Sensitive
Receivers
Appendix F Implementation Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures
Appendix G Record Photos
Appendix H Site Inspection Proforma for July
2002
Appendix I Standard Site Audit Checklist
This is the fifth EM&A Report
for the project of Road Widening Works of Salisbury Road between Nathan Road
and Canton Road. The contract entitled ‘Contract No. HY/98/22, Supplementary
Agreement No. 3, Road Widening Works of Salisbury Road between Nathan Road and
Canton Road’ was awarded to Downer Construction (Hong Kong) Limited in February
2002.
This report mainly presents the
EM&A works undertaken for the captioned project from 1 July 2002 to 31 July
2002.
Air Quality
Site inspection was carried out
once per week by checking the adequacy of the mitigation measures implemented
by the Contractor with reference to the EM&A Manual.
No obvious air quality
deterioration was recorded during the reporting period.
Noise Level
No indication of noise exceedance
was observed during weekly site inspections for this reporting period.
Others
Three non-compliances were
identified on 4 July 2002 and mitigation measures had been provided by the
Contractor immediately and recorded by the ET on 22 July 2002 and 29 July 2002.
No notifications of summons, no
successful prosecutions, no written and verbal complaints were received in July
2002.
Future Key Issues
Future construction activities,
such as pavement and footpath construction, central divider reconstruction, road
furniture and signage installation, resurfacing works and landscaping works
will be closely monitored to ensure the effects on air quality and noise level
are minimised.
1.1 Background
Downer Construction (Hong Kong) Limited is the Contractor for the
Supplementary Agreement No. 3 (SA3) for the Contract No. HY/98/22 Road Widening
Works of Salisbury Road between Nathan Road and Canton Road. The road widening
works will provide an additional Salisbury Road southbound lane from Hong Kong
Space Museum to Hong Kong Cultural Centre. Other construction works include
pavement resurfacing, central divider and footpath reconstruction, drainage
works and landscaping works.
The purpose of this report is to report the EM&A works in the period
between 1 July 2002 and 31 July 2002.
1.2 Project Organisation and Management
Structure for EM&A Works
An environmental team (ET)
has been established to investigate and audit the Contractor’s equipment and
work methodologies, to monitor and to audit reports, and to provide
recommendations and improvements. An Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
has been employed to review the EM&A works by the ET. The Engineer is
generally responsible for supervising the contractor’s activities, reviewing
the EM&A works and mitigation measures. Section 1.4 of the EM&A Manual
can also be referred for the overall works.
The
project organization chart and management structure for EM&A works are
shown in Appendix A.
1.3 Contact
Details of Key Management
Titles,
names and contact telephone numbers of the key personnel of the captioned
project are tabulated below:
|
Title |
Name |
Contact Number |
|
Project Director |
Mr.
Peter Bugden |
2831
8335 |
|
Highways Department |
Mr. Simon
C.H. Leung |
2707
7250 |
|
Environmental Protection Department (EPD) (EM&A Section) |
Mr.
Anthony Y.K. Ho |
2835
1871 |
|
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) |
Mr.
Tim Cramp |
2893
1551 |
|
The Engineer's Representative (ER) |
Mr.
Felix Chan |
2605 6262 |
|
Quality and Environmental Department |
Mr.
Richard Cuta |
2831
8123 |
|
Environmental
Team (ET) – Babtie Asia Limited |
Mr.
Mark K.T. Cheung |
2738
3803 |
|
Project
Manager |
Mr.
Ricky Lee |
9252
6252 |
|
Site
Agent |
Mr.
M.W. Suen |
6274
5512 |
|
Title |
Name |
Contact Number |
|
General
Foreman |
Mr.
K.K. Lau |
6274
3128 |
|
Foreman |
Mr. To
Wing Tak |
6274
5515 |
|
Survey
Team |
Mr.
T.S. Chan |
6274
3633 |
|
Safety
Team |
Mr.
Yuen Wai Ip |
9038
9055 |
1.4 Construction Programme
The latest
construction programme is attached in Appendix B. Environmental
protection/mitigation measures are implemented during the construction phase,
the construction programme is subject to continuous refinement.
1.5 Works undertaken in July 2002
The
major construction activities and works undertaken in July 2002 were as
follows:
·
Surfacing of the pavement
of the additional Salisbury Road southbound lane.
·
Reconstruction of central
divider of Salisbury Road outside Peninsula Hotel and YMCA
Hotel
·
Resurfacing of the pavement
outside Peninsula Hotel and YMCA Hotel
·
Surfacing of pavement of
the additional Salisbury Road southbound lane outside Hong
Kong Space Museum and Hong Kong Cultural Centre
·
Road furniture and signage
installation at footpath area
·
Reprovision of a park and
landscaping works at the ex-location of the site office
1.6 Project
Works Area
The
project works area is shown in Appendix C. The boundary of the works area to
the west of Nathan Road is also given in Appendix C.
2.0 SUMMARY OF EM&A REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Air Quality
According to
Section 1.3 of the EM&A Manual, the captioned project involves minor road
widening works. Because of the short construction period (approximately 6 to 7
months), together with staged construction sequence of works which will limit
the extent of construction area at any one time. Therefore, air quality is
monitored by means of checking the adequacy of dust mitigation measures
implemented by the Contractor (Please refer to Section 2.1 of the EM&A Manual
or Section 2.3.1 of this report for dust mitigation measures). It is
anticipated that proper implementation of dust reduction measures will be
adequate to mitigate dust impacts and maintain Total Suspended Particulate
(TSP) concentration levels within those recommended under the Air Quality
Objectives (AQO) and no further air quality monitoring will be necessary.
All of the dust
monitoring locations identified in the EIA Study is located in the vicinity of
the proposed vehicular underpass (located at the Salisbury Road/Chatham Road
South junction), the monitoring works of which will be carried out as part of
the works east of Nathan Road by KCRC. Hence, the standard requirements of
collating Baseline Monitoring Results, calculation of Action and Limit Levels
etc. have been omitted from this report. These requirements will be fulfilled
under the EM&A for the works east of Nathan Road. Dust monitoring locations adjacent to the project
works area of the captioned project are shown in Appendix D.
Should there be
any obvious air quality deterioration as a result of the construction works,
the ET will perform additional monitoring using, for example, High Volume Sampler (HVS), to measure
TSP concentration levels so as to ensure that any deteriorating air quality can
be readily detected and timely action is to be taken to rectify the situation.
According to
Section 4.1 of the EM&A Manual, regular site inspections are carried out by
the ET at least once per week.
Additional monitoring will be performed
by the ET in the event of complaints from the local residents, and/or any
obvious indication of deterioration of air quality is observed.
2.1.1 Air Sensitive Receivers
According to Section 7.4 of the Final
EIA Report, Peninsula Hotel, YMCA Hotel, Hong Kong Space Museum, Museum of Art
and Hong Kong Cultural Centre are identified as air sensitive receivers. Their
locations are shown in Appendix E.
2.1.2 Air Quality Monitoring
According to
Section 1.3 of the EM&A Manual, it is anticipated that proper implementation
of dust reduction measures (see Section 2.1 of the EM&A Manual or Section
3.5 of the Final EIA Report for details) will be adequate to mitigate dust
impacts and maintain TSP concentration levels within those recommended under
the Air Quality Objectives (AQO), and no further air quality monitoring will be
necessary.
Should the
Contractor does not implement appropriate dust mitigation measures properly
during construction phase and result in deterioration of air quality, and/or
complaints (including verbal complaints) are received from local residents, the
ET will perform TSP
concentration level measurement.
Monitoring
parameters
1. 24-hour TSP concentration level for
every week
2. 3x1-hour TSP concentration level for
every six days
2.1.3 Monitoring
Locations
Dust monitoring locations adjacent to
the project works area of the captioned project are shown in Appendix D.
According to Section 10.1.3 of the Final EIA Report, these dust monitoring
locations are closest to the air sensitive receivers affected by the captioned
project.
2.2 Noise
Though
requirements for noise monitoring has not been specified in the EM&A
Manual, during the course of site inspection carried out by the ET, the ET will
closely monitor construction noise. Should there be any obvious indication of
construction noise level exceedance observed by the ET during site inspections,
the ET will perform additional monitoring and will carry out noise monitoring
works to measure the exceedance of noise level, with reference to the Noise
Control Ordinance. Measurement of construction noise level will be carried out
using an Integrating Sound Level Meter with calibrator which complied with
EPD's requirements.
Additional monitoring will be performed by
the ET in the event of complaints from the local residents, and/or any obvious
indication of construction noise level exceedance is observed.
2.2.1 Noise Sensitive Receivers
According to Section 4.3 of the Final
EIA Report, the noise standards only apply to dwellings relying on opened
windows for ventilation. Since central air-conditioning systems are provided
for all hotels which do not rely on openable windows for ventilation, these
noise sensitive receivers are less sensitive to noise impacts.
2.2.2 Noise Level Monitoring
During the
course of site inspection, the ET will closely monitor construction noise
levels.
Should there be
any obvious indication of construction noise level exceedance observed by the
ET during site inspections, and/or complaints (including verbal complaints) are
received from local residents, the ET will perform construction noise
measurement.
Monitoring
parameters
1. Leq (30 min) for the time
period between 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays
2. L10 and L90 (for
reference)
2.3 Environmental Mitigation Measures
2.3.1 Air Quality
Dust control and
mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction phase are listed
in Section 2.1 of the EM&A Manual and Sections 3.5 and 10.1.7 of the Final
EIA Report. Some environmental mitigation measures are as follows:
·
Use of regular watering to reduce dust emissions from exposed site
surfaces and unpaved roads, with complete coverage, particularly during dry
weather.
·
Use of frequent watering for particularly
dusty static construction areas and areas close to air quality sensitive
receivers.
·
Side enclosure and covering of any
aggregate or dusty material storage piles to reduce emissions. Where this is
not practicable owing to frequent usage, watering should be employed to
aggregate fines.
·
Tarpaulin covering of all dusty vehicle
loads transported to, from and between site locations.
·
Establishment and use of vehicle wheel
and body washing facilities at the exit points of the site, combined with cleaning
of public roads where necessary.
·
Imposition of speed controls for
vehicles and unpaved site roads.
·
Where feasible, routing of vehicles and
positioning of construction plant should be at maximum possible distance from
air quality sensitive receivers.
·
Instigation of an environmental
monitoring and auditing program to monitor the construction process in order to
enforce controls and modify methods of work if dusty conditions arise.
2.3.2 Noise
According to
Section 4.4 of the Final EIA Report, construction noise level experienced by
the noise sensitive receivers surrounding the project works area are
significantly reduced by with window insulation and central air-conditioning.
If the Contractor implements good site practices listed in Appendix H of the
Final EIA Report, construction noise level experienced by the noise sensitive
receivers will be further reduced. Some of these good site practices are as
follows:
·
The Contractor shall comply with and observe the Noise Control Ordinance
and its subsidiary regulations in force in Hong Kong.
·
Before the commencement of any works,
the Engineer may require the methods of working, equipment and sound-reducing
intended to be used on the site to be made available for inspection and approval
to ensure that they are suitable for the project.
·
The Contractor shall devise, arrange
methods of working and carry out the Works in such a manner so as to minimise
noise impacts on the surrounding environment, and shall provide experienced
personnel with suitable training to ensure that these methods are implemented.
The noise reduction methods shall include, but not be limited to,
scheduling of works, siting of facilities, selection of quiet equipment, and
use of purpose-built acoustic panels and enclosures.
·
The Contractor shall ensure that all
plant and equipment to be used on site are properly maintained in good
operating condition and noisy construction activities shall be effectively
sound-reduced by means of silencers, mufflers, acoustic linings or shields,
acoustic sheds or screens or other means to avoid disturbance to any nearby
noise sensitive receivers.
3.0 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
MEASURES
An
implementation schedule of environmental mitigation measures is attached in
Appendix F.
3.1 Environmental Mitigation Measures
implemented by the Contractor in July 2002
The
Contractor implemented adequate environmental mitigation measures to reduce
dust emissions to the air sensitive receivers adjacent to the project works
area by:
·
Tarpaulin covering of
excavated materials stockpiles temporarily stored on site and those on trucks
being transported to dumping sites, to reduce dust emissions during
transportation of dusty materials.
·
Removal of surplus excavated
materials from roadside to reduce dust emissions blown up by speedy vehicles.
·
Regular watering of exposed
site surfaces and excavated materials.
The
aforementioned environmental mitigation measures are also listed in Section 2.1
of the EM&A Manual and Section 2.3 of this EM&A Report.
During all site inspections carried out in July 2002,
weather condition is mainly fine. Wind is clam.
4.1 Air
Quality
The Contractor had implemented adequate and effective
mitigation measures to reduce dust nuisance during execution of the Works.
Since most of the widening works and surfacing of the additional Salisbury Road
southbound lane had been finished, some area of the site was tidied up and
hence visual impact of the construction works to surrounding environment was
lessened.
Photo 1 in
Appendix G shows that heaps of sand was covered with tarpaulin, which reduced
dust emissions effectively.
Some of the
pavement area was already opened to traffic, and others were screened with
railings, safety of pedestrians and other road-users was assured.
4.2 Noise
No obvious noise level exceedance was observed during
site inspections.
4.3 Adverse
effects on Air Quality and Noise Level from Non-construction Activities and/or Activities
from other Construction Sites
During the course of site inspection, no adverse
effects on air quality and noise level due to non-construction activities
and/or activities from other construction sites were observed.
5.0 RECORD OF NON-COMPLIANCES, COMPLAINTS, NOTIFICATIONS OF SUMMONS AND
SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTIONS
5.1 Non-compliances
Three non-compliances were identified on 4 July 2002.
5.2 Complaints
and Verbal Complaints
No
written and verbal complaints were received in the month.
5.3 Notifications
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
No notifications
of summons or successful prosecutions were received by the Contractor in the
reporting month.
5.4 Review
of the Reasons for, and the Implications of, Non-compliances
Details of the three non-compliances identified on 4
July 2002 are as follows:
1)
Aggregate and the exposed
site surfaces were not covered with tarpaulin.
2)
No drip trays were provided
underneath chemical drums.
3)
Tree roots of the trees
affected by the captioned project were not protected with wet Hessian bags.
Regarding non-compliance no. 1, uncovered aggregate
(and other materials) and exposed site surfaces may result in dust emission
nuisance due to strong wind and speedy passing vehicles.
Regarding non-compliance no. 2, not providing drip
trays underneath chemical drums cannot hold any leaked chemicals in case of
leakage, soil underneath and surrounding soil may be polluted.
Regarding non-compliance no. 3, health of the trees without
properly-protected roots may be adversely affected. The reason is that
unprotected tree roots are exposed to strong sunlight and therefore water
stored in the tree roots will be evaporated, and this may cause dewatering and
deterioration of the tree roots and more seriously, desiccation of the whole
tree structure. Regular watering can only provide water to the tree roots, but
not protecting the tree roots, therefore covering the tree roots with wet
Hessian bags is the most effective measures to protect the tree roots.
5.5 Actions
taken to rectify the Non-compliances
During the site inspection on 8 July 2002, it was
observed that all aggregates and exposed site surfaces were covered with
tarpaulin. The chemical drum was already removed and relocated at Downer’s site
office.
During the site inspection on 29 July 2002, it was
observed that tree roots of the trees affected by the captioned project were
protected with wet Hessian bags.
5.6 Actions
taken in the event of Non-compliances
If non-compliances are identified during site
inspections, the ET Leader will sign a site inspection proforma. The site
inspection proforma records the locations and descriptions of the
non-compliances identified and will propose mitigation actions to rectify the
non-compliances. Such mitigation actions must be implemented and the
non-compliances must be rectified within the date of confirmation stipulated in
the site inspection proforma.
According to the
latest construction programme attached in Appendix B, the proposed construction
works to be carried out in the next reporting period (August 2002) are as
follows:
·
Reconstruction and reinstatement of footpath area outside Hong Kong
Space Museum and Hong Kong Cultural Centre
·
Installation of road furniture and road signage
·
Reconstruction of central
divider of Salisbury Road outside Peninsula Hotel and YMCA
Hotel
·
Resurfacing of the pavement
outside Peninsula Hotel and YMCA Hotel
·
Surfacing of pavement of
the additional Salisbury Road southbound lane outside Hong
Kong Space Museum and Hong Kong Cultural Centre
·
Reprovision of a park and
landscaping works at the ex-location of the site office
Some of them may
have potential environmental impact and will require mitigation measures, and
such activities will be monitored closely during future site inspections.
6.1 Potential Environmental
Impacts
Potential
environmental impacts on surrounding environment from the aforementioned
construction works are:
·
Dust and odour (from hot asphalt) will be generated from surfacing works
of the additional Salisbury Road southbound lane and resurfacing works of
Salisbury Road northbound lane.
·
Operation of plant and equipment during the aforementioned construction
works will deteriorate air quality and increase construction noise level.
·
Construction waste, general refuse and office wastes will be produced.
·
Used oil and lubricant will be produced from plant and equipment
employed in the aforementioned construction works.
6.2 Mitigation Measures
According to
Waste Management Plan and Section 7.3 of this EM&A Report, construction
waste generated in the captioned project which cannot be reused and recycled
will be transported to either Tseung Kwan O public filling area or Tolo Harbour
Reclamation Area. In order to minimise environmental impacts of these
demolition wastes before and during transportation, such wastes must be
properly covered when temporarily stored on site before transportation and
during transportation for disposal.
General refuse
and office wastes can be reduced by recycling and reuse, please refer to Waste
Management Plan and Section 7.5 of this EM&A Report for details.
The Contractor
can devise, arrange and implement methods of working and carry out the works in
such a manner to minimise noise impacts on surrounding environment. Moreover,
the Contractor must ensure that all plant and equipment to be used on site are
properly maintained in good operating condition and noisy construction
activities must be effectively sound-reduced using silencers, shields or
acoustic sheds. Please refer to Section 2.3.2 of this EM&A Report and
Appendix H of the Final EM&A Report for more details.
7.0 ADVICE
ON THE SOLID AND LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT STATUS
The Contractor had carried
out adequate solid and liquid waste management during construction works in
accordance with the revised Waste Management Plan in this reporting period.
7.1 Excess
Excavated Materials
The estimated quantity of excavated
materials produced during execution of the captioned project in July 2002 is
80m3.
The Contractor stockpiles
excavated materials which will be reused for landscaping and backfilling
temporarily on site. These excavated materials are covered with tarpaulin.
Excavated materials which
cannot be reused for backfilling were transported to either Tseung Kwan O
public filling area or Tolo Harbour Reclamation Area, according to the Waste
Management Plan. Such materials were covered with tarpaulin, which could
effectively reduce dust emissions during transportation.
7.2 Construction
Waste
According to the Waste
Management Plan, the Contractor separated construction wastes which could be
reused on site and recycled with those to be disposed of. This was carried out
by general workforce under supervision of Foremen and charge hands. For
example, timber (for formwork) was cleaned for reuse, steel was stored for
reuse, reinforcement was sorted into usable lengths for recycling or reuse on
site.
7.3 Demolition
Waste
None of the demolition
waste generated in the captioned project will be reused, according to the Waste
Management Plan. Such waste is transported to either Tseung Kwan O public
filling area or Tolo Harbour Reclamation Area.
7.4 Chemical
Waste
No chemical waste is
generated in the captioned project.
7.5 General
Refuse
The Contractor deposited
aluminium cans, plastic bottles and glass bottles in separately labelled bins
for recycling and reuse.
The
Contractor reduced office wastes through recycling of paper. Signs encouraging
environmental awareness, such as reducing the number of photocopies to a
minimum and using both sides of papers, etc., were put on in the Contractor’s
site office.
8.0 SITE INSPECTION PROFORMA FOR JULY 2002
Site inspection
proforma for July 2002 is attached in Appendix H. Locations of deficiencies are
shown on the site plan attached in Appendix H.
A
standard site audit checklist is attached in Appendix I.
Appendix A PROJECT ORGANISATION
CHART AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE FOR STRUCTURE FOR EM&A WORKS
|
|
Highways Department Contact Person: Mr. Simon C.H. Leung Telephone No.: 2707 7250 ·
Overall responsibility of the Project ·
Co-ordinate with EPD for decision making for any
non-compliance observed |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Engineer’s Representative (ER) Contract Person: Mr. Felix Chan Telephone No.: 2605 6262 ·
Supervise the Contractor’s activities and ensure
that requirements in the EM&A Manual are fully complied with ·
Inform the Contractor when action is required to
reduce impacts ·
Review the EM&A works performed by the ET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Protection Department (EPD) (EM&A Section) Contact Person: Mr. Anthony Y.K. Ho Telephone No.: 2835 1871 ·
Regulatory body ·
EM&A approval |
|
|
The Contractor Contact Person: Mr. M.W. Suen (Site Agent) Telephone No.: 9202 9341 ·
Employ the ET to undertake monitoring, and
reporting of EM&A ·
Provide assistance to the ET in carrying out
monitoring ·
Implement measures to reduce impact |
||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) Contact Person: Mr. Tim Cramp Telephone No.: 2893 1551 ·
Review the EM&A works performed by the ET ·
Audit monitoring activities and results ·
Review the EM&A reports submitted by the ET |
|
|
Environmental Team (ET) Contact Person: Mr. Mark K.T. Cheung Telephone No.: 2738 3803 ·
Monitor the various environmental parameters as
required in the EM&A Manual ·
Carry out site inspections to investigate and
audit the Contractor’s site practices, equipment and work methodologies with
respect to pollution control and environmental mitigation and anticipate
environmental issues for proactive action before problems arise ·
Audit and prepare audit reports on the environmental
monitoring data and the site environmental conditions |
||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary
Agreement No. 3
Road Widening
Works of Salisbury Road
between
Nathan Road and Canton Road

Management
Structure for EM&A Works
Supplementary
Agreement No. 3
Road
Widening Works of Salisbury Road
Between Nathan
Road and Canton Road
APPENDIX B CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME







APPENDIX D DUST MONITORING LOCATIONS

APPENDIX E LOCATIONS OF AIR SENSITIVE RECEIVERS

APPENDIX F
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES
The
schedule of implementation of the recommended mitigation measures for various
environmental aspects are presented in Tables F1 and F4 for different
environmental aspects
|
EIA
Ref. |
EM&A
Log Ref |
Environmental
Protection Measures |
Location/Duration of measures/Timing of completion of Measures |
Implementation
Dept/agent |
Implementation
Stage |
Relevant
Legislation and Guidelines |
||
|
Des |
Con |
Op |
||||||
|
Section
3.5 |
Section
2.1 |
Established
standards and guidelines with EPD’s recommended pollution control clauses should
be incorporated in the contract documents |
During
Construction Phase within the site area |
Contractor |
Ö |
Ö |
|
|
|
Dust
reduction measures while carrying out construction works in accordance with the
Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation to minimise the dust
emission from the construction site |
Ö |
Ö |
|
TM
on EIA Process, APCO, Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
||||
Notes:
1.
Des = Design, C = Construction, O = Operation
2.
EIA Ref = Section number reference in EIA for
Salisbury Road Underpass and Associated Road Improvement Works including Middle
Road Circulation System (Final EIA Report (June 1999))
3.
EM&A Log ref = Section number reference in
EM&A Manual
Table F2 Summary
of Proposed Mitigation Measures for Construction Waste Management
|
EIA
Ref. |
EM&A
Log Ref |
Environmental
Protection Measures |
Location/Duration of measures/Timing of completion of Measures |
Implementation
Dept/agent |
Implementation
Stage |
Relevant
Legislation and Guidelines |
||
|
Des |
Con |
Op |
||||||
|
Section
6.3 |
Section
3.1 |
On-site
separation of both municipal solid waste and C&D waste should be
conducted as far as possible.
Construction waste should be sorted on-site into construction &
demolition waste and public fill fraction for re-use and recycling as far as
practical |
During
Construction Phase within the site area |
Contractor |
Ö |
Ö |
Ö |
TM
on EIA Process, WDO |
|
Waste
management measures would be proposed in accordance with the Criteria for Evaluating
Waste Management Implications stipulated in Annex 7 of the TM EIAO and follow
the Guidelines for Assessment of Waste Management Implications stated in
Annex 15 of the TM EIAO as appropriate |
||||||||
|
Standard
C&D materials management clause should be included in the construction
contact |
||||||||
Notes:
1.
Des = Design, C = Construction, O = Operation
2.
EIA Ref = Section number reference in EIA for
Salisbury Road Underpass and Associated Road Improvement Works including Middle
Road Circulation System (Final EIA Report (June 1999))
3.
EM&A Log ref = Section number reference in
EM&A Manual
Table F3 Summary
of Proposed Mitigation Measures for Visual Impact
|
EIA
Ref. |
EM&A
Log Ref |
Environmental
Protection Measures |
Location/Duration of measures |
Funding
Dept/agent |
Implementation
Dept/agent |
Maintenance
Agent |
Implementation
Stages |
Relevant
Legislation and Guidelines |
||
|
Des |
Con |
Op |
||||||||
|
Section
8.7 (Temporary Mitigation Measures |
N/A |
Screening
of site works by hoardings |
In
place at the commencement and for the duration of the Construction Phase with
the site area |
HyD |
Contractor |
Contractor
(During Construction Phase) |
Ö |
Ö |
|
|
|
Surface
treatment of site hoardings to enhance their visual interest and harmony with
surrounding landscape/townscape |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Locating
temporary buildings (e.g. Site office) in least visually prominent locations |
Design
Engineer/Contractor |
|
Ö |
|
||||||
|
Retention
of vegetation within the works site area where possible |
Landscape
Architect / Contractor |
Ö |
Ö |
|
||||||
|
Provision
of fences around all the low, circular raised planters to ensure that
materials and debris will not be dumped on tree roots |
Contractor |
|
Ö |
|
||||||
|
Footpaths
along south side of Salisbury Road will be replanted with heavy standard trees
where possible. The proposed
planning will also reprovide shading along the footpath temporarily removed
during the construction stage |
In
place by the completion of Construction Phase within the site area, to be
maintained for the duration of Operation Phase |
HyD |
Landscape
Architect/Contractor |
Contractor
(During construction phase) LCSD
(during operation phase) |
Ö |
|
Ö |
|
||
Notes:
1.
Des = Design, C = Construction, O = Operation
2.
EIA Ref = Section number reference in EIA for
Salisbury Road Underpass and Associated Road Improvement Works including Middle
Road Circulation System (Final EIA Report (June 1999))
3.
EM&A Log ref = Section number reference in EM&A
Manual
Table F4 Summary
of Proposed Mitigation Measures for Landscape and Townscape Impacts
|
EIA
Ref. |
EM&A
Log Ref |
Environmental
Protection Measures |
Location/Duration of measures |
Funding
Dept/agent |
Implementation
Dept/agent |
Maintenance
Agent |
Implementation
Stages |
Relevant
Legislation and Guidelines |
||
|
Des |
Con |
Op |
||||||||
|
Section
8.8 (Temporary Mitigation Measures |
N/A |
Re-routing
of pedestrian routes away from the work site where possible |
In
place at the commencement and for the duration of the Construction Phase with
the site area |
HyD |
Contractor |
Contractor
(During Construction Phase) |
|
Ö |
|
|
|
Re-routing
of pedestrian routes through well defined public access |
||||||||||
|
Retaining
and minimizing damage to vegetation where possible. Care shall be taken not to damage those trees identified
in the Tree Survey Report to be retained during the construction phase |
||||||||||
|
Careful and
efficient transplanting of existing vegetation carried out under the
supervision of a professional landscape architect |
||||||||||
Notes:
1.
Des = Design, C = Construction, O = Operation
2.
EIA Ref = Section number reference in EIA for
Salisbury Road Underpass and Associated Road Improvement Works including Middle
Road Circulation System (Final EIA Report (June 1999))
3.
EM&A Log ref = Section number reference in
EM&A Manual
Table F4 Summary
of Proposed Mitigation Measures for Landscape and Townscape Impacts (continued)
|
EIA
Ref. |
EM&A
Log Ref |
Environmental
Protection Measures |
Location/Duration of measures |
Funding
Dept/agent |
Implementation
Dept/agent |
Maintenance
Agent |
Implementation
Stages |
Relevant
Legislation and Guidelines |
||
|
Des |
Con |
Op |
||||||||
|
Section
8.8 (Temporary Mitigation Measures) |
N/A |
Mitigation for vegetation loss may be achieved in
the form of compensatory planting of transplanting of existing trees in the
area or new plant material as suggested in the Tree Survey Report. This is recommended to be implemented
on the footpaths of Salisbury Road where space allows |
In
place at the commencement of the Construction Phase within the site area, to
be maintained for the duration of Operation Phase |
HyD |
Contractor
(The detailed landscape proposal shall be provided to LCSD for endorsement) |
Contractor
(During Construction Phase) HyD
(first 12 months of operational phase) LCSD
(after first 12 months in operational phase) |
Ö |
|
Ö |
Works
Bureau Technical Circular No. 24/94 |
|
Relocation of existing trees within the site and where
possible, ensuring transplanted trees are to be planted to new position
within the site |
Landscape
Architect / Contractor |
Ö |
|
Ö |
||||||
|
Planting of heavy standard trees along footpaths
of Salisbury Road to create vegetation screen |
||||||||||
|
Detailing of street furniture such as footpath
surfaces and railings to enhance the pedestrian environment |
Contractor |
HyD |
Ö |
Ö |
|
|||||
Notes:
1.
Des = Design, C = Construction, O = Operation
2.
EIA Ref = Section number reference in EIA for
Salisbury Road Underpass and Associated Road Improvement Works including Middle
Road Circulation System (Final EIA Report (June 1999))
3.
EM&A Log ref = Section number reference in
EM&A Manual
Table F4 Summary
of Proposed Mitigation Measures for Landscape and Townscape Impacts (continued)
|
EIA
Ref. |
EM&A
Log Ref |
Environmental
Protection Measures |
Location/Duration of measures |
Funding
Dept/agent |
Implementation
Dept/agent |
Maintenance
Agent |
Implementation
Stages |
Relevant
Legislation and Guidelines |
||
|
Des |
Con |
Op |
||||||||
|
Section
8.8 (Temporary Mitigation Measures) |
N/A |
Planting of flowering trees and shrubs etc, shall
be considered so as to create colour impacts, strong sense of seasonal changes
and where possible, provide shade for the pedestrians |
In
place at the commencement of the Construction Phase within the site area, to
be maintained for the duration of Operation Phase |
HyD |
Landscape
Architect/Contractor |
Contractor
(During Construction Phase) HyD
(first 12 months of operational phase) LCSD
(after first 12 months in operational phase) |
Ö |
|
Ö |
Works
Bureau Technical Circular No. 24/94 |
Notes:
1.
Des = Design, C = Construction, O = Operation
2.
EIA Ref = Section number reference in EIA for
Salisbury Road Underpass and Associated Road Improvement Works including Middle
Road Circulation System (Final EIA Report (June 1999))
3.
EM&A Log ref = Section number reference in
EM&A Manual
|
|
Photo 1 |
Record Photos for EM&A Works
Contract No. HY/98/22
Supplementary Agreement No. 3
Road Widening Works of Salisbury Road
between Nathan Road and Canton Road